Editorial protocol / public

Trust needs a visible method.

HomeRobotHQ separates documented facts, manufacturer claims, independent evidence, our analysis, and direct testing. Readers should always know which kind of evidence supports a conclusion.

Evidence hierarchy

Start at the source. Show the gaps.

01

Official documentation

Product pages, manuals, support pages, developer docs, policies, and regulatory records.

02

Independent evidence

Credible reporting, expert demonstrations, teardown evidence, and clearly identified owner experience.

03

HomeRobotHQ analysis

A reasoned interpretation of suitability, value, or tradeoffs, always labeled as analysis.

04

Hands-on evidence

Original setup, measurements, photos, tests, and long-term notes only when we possess the product.

Research Score

Useful dimensions, without laboratory theater.

At launch, HomeRobotHQ will score only what can be researched responsibly. Physical reliability and real-world autonomy remain unscored until direct testing or strong independent evidence exists.

01

Price and value

Published price, included hardware and software, and relevant alternatives.

02

Availability

Current order status, launch regions, delivery language, shipping, and support.

03

Documented capabilities

Claims supported by official documentation and credible independent evidence.

04

Software ecosystem

Apps, SDKs, APIs, open-source access, integrations, and update model.

05

Getting started

Documentation quality, required hardware and software, and known setup friction.

06

Privacy transparency

Published data practices, sensors, accounts, connectivity, and user controls.

Corrections and updates

Robotics changes quickly. Verification dates matter.

Product pages show when their source set was last reviewed. Changed prices, launch windows, software access, and availability should be updated with a linked source and a new verification date.

See the current research index